Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Three blonde, blue-eyed siblings are named Suzy, Jack and Bill.  What color hair does the sister have?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by LinksEtc
 - August 15, 2014, 11:07:16 AM
I thought you might comment on that one.

:)

Thanks.
Posted by CMdeux
 - August 14, 2014, 10:58:59 PM
Hmmmm--

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/532237_1

And I think that Dr. Scheffler's remarks on this are still in keeping with the results reported above.

It's a useful add-on to a regular allopathic workup when in the hands of a competent allergy care professional... but as a fishing expedition it's probably no better than any of the other stuff out there.  Well.  Maybe better than kinesiology or something.  But not by a lot, probably.

Posted by LinksEtc
 - August 14, 2014, 06:29:01 PM
Tweeted by @MatthewBowdish


"The basophil activation test diagnoses peanut allergy with high accuracy"
http://www.aaaai.org/global/latest-research-summaries/Current-JACI-Research/basophil-activation-test.aspx

QuoteBAT made an accurate diagnosis of peanut allergy or tolerance in 97% of cases. It showed 98% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 95% positive predictive value and 98% negative predictive value in the primary study population and 83% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value and 90% negative predictive value in the validation population.

QuoteSantos and colleagues concluded that BAT to peanut can be performed in cases where conventional allergy tests are inconclusive before deciding to refer a patient for an OFC.