Quote from: Macabre on September 14, 2013, 11:00:34 AM
Okay, when I used the word "lust" above, I had no idea that this teacher is actually male.
Just saying.
Quote from: yelloww on September 14, 2013, 10:38:24 AM
TT makes a very good point. This teacher likely isn't versed in privacy for medical issues.....
Generally speaking, most teachers have policies where they won't eat homemade goods. I NEVER EVER eat something that a kid brings in or makes in home ec. No way. That's a food borne illness waiting to happen.
Beyond FA's, if the teacher won't eat it himself/herself, then it shouldn't enter the room. No matter what it is.
Quote from: Macabre on September 14, 2013, 11:00:34 AM
Okay, when I used the word "lust" above, I had no idea that this teacher is actually male.
Just saying.
Quote from: twinturbo on September 14, 2013, 10:59:28 AM
With the teacher admitting this is new ground for him on non-food treats to remove exclusion it may be worth explicitly setting some boundaries for him on what he is, and is not, able to discuss with other parents once the new policy kicks in. Considering he is still held to FERPA and a 504 is ensuing it would be fair to him to give him an idea what you consider fair game as open knowledge wrt to protected info so he knows where the boundary lies.