Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Spell the answer to 6 + 7 =:
Three blonde, blue-eyed siblings are named Suzy, Jack and Bill.  What color hair does the sister have?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by twinturbo
 - February 23, 2014, 05:46:25 PM
Sounds like DS2. He birthed with a *thud*.
Posted by aggiedog
 - February 23, 2014, 05:36:39 PM
PA dd was a fatso.  She looked like a toad - you had to go digging for her neck. LOL  So definitely no in utero growth issues!  But yes, eczema pretty much from the get go.
Posted by twinturbo
 - February 23, 2014, 03:44:13 PM
Quote from: YouKnowWho on February 23, 2014, 03:14:15 PM
  First ana event at 6mo to small amounts of barley in a jarred food.  Poor little bugger.

That brings back memories.
Posted by YouKnowWho
 - February 23, 2014, 03:14:15 PM
I'm pretty sure DS1's allergies were in utero.  Eczema within days of birth, low birth weight for full term baby (and I know everyone says "oh but you are tiny" but I have a family history of 9lb babies within my family and DH's), problems gaining weight while breastfeeding.  First ana event at 6mo to small amounts of barley in a jarred food.  Poor little bugger.
Posted by CMdeux
 - February 23, 2014, 12:44:30 PM
Yes, that is my guess, too, Aggie.

DD had eczema patches pretty much from birth.
Posted by aggiedog
 - February 23, 2014, 12:36:30 PM
Mac, maybe not active FA's, as I'd assume the fetal immune system would be dampened.  But dd's eczema was bad almost immediately, and she was exclusively breastfed with the same diet I'd had before I delivered her.  I'm guessing the allergies (or allergic potentials) were there, just needing to be activated, YKWIM?
Posted by krasota
 - February 23, 2014, 12:05:01 PM
Well, my kids are screwed.  ;)
Posted by CMdeux
 - February 23, 2014, 11:03:51 AM
AFAIK, the first exposure to peanuts that DD had was at 11mo.  Seriously-- we didn't even keep them in the house, really.  I ate candy bars at work.  I remember having to BUY the peanut butter.

About 90 seconds after ingesting ~100mg, she was in full-blown anaphylaxis.  So.   :-/

Posted by Macabre
 - February 23, 2014, 10:27:43 AM
I wonder if there is such a thing as in utero FAs.
Posted by aggiedog
 - February 23, 2014, 08:15:20 AM
I was studying for my boards and pretty much managed to stay awake with constant hand-to-mouth from a jar a peanuts, while pregnant with PA dd.  In fact, she had pretty bad eczema within a few days of being born, even if her PA wasn't discovered until 13 months.

Posted by eragon
 - February 22, 2014, 05:06:22 PM
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24508911   just adding another study, different one btw.
Posted by becca
 - February 22, 2014, 03:56:00 PM
It mentions the first trimester.  I did not eat much of anything the first trimester, but later in my second and 3rd was when I ate loads of eggs and PBJ and fluffanutter sandwiches, not together.  ;)  Dd has PA and EA.

So, they didn't talk to me either.
Posted by yelloww
 - February 21, 2014, 09:43:25 PM
Yeah  they didn't talk to me either!  ~)
Posted by GoingNuts
 - February 21, 2014, 09:22:39 PM
 ;D
Posted by YouKnowWho
 - February 21, 2014, 07:24:49 PM
Quote from: GoingNuts on February 21, 2014, 12:04:13 PM
Ahem.  They clearly didn't bother interviewing me.

Uhhh, no because we skew studies like this in a bad way  :evil: