Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Spell the answer to 6 + 7 =:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by LinksEtc
 - December 24, 2014, 09:57:30 PM
I saw this first link mentioned by Homa ...


"FARE Changes Corporate Sponsorship Page After Test Results and ContentChecked Admission"
http://snacksafely.com/2014/12/fare-changes-corporate-sponsorship-policy-after-test-results-and-contentchecked-admission/

QuoteIn tests, ContentChecked declared a series of common food products "free from peanuts" despite clearly visible "may contain peanuts" warnings on their labels.
QuoteSnackSafely.com is in the process of initiating actions with Consumer Reports, the Better Business Bureau, and the NJ Attorney General's Office.

----------------------


but then I saw this 2nd "correction" post ...


"Fair is Fare: We Stand Corrected"
http://snacksafely.com/2014/12/fair-is-fare-we-stand-corrected/

QuoteAfter publishing the results of our test of the ContentChecked and Wazinit apps in which both apps misidentified a series of products bearing "may contain" warnings as "free from", we approached FARE because of what appeared to be a tacit endorsement of ContentChecked's app that accompanied the firm's logo on their Corporate Partners page

----------------------


Anyway ... seems to be an issue ... I never felt comfy with those types of apps. 

Always read the label!