Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Three blonde, blue-eyed siblings are named Suzy, Jack and Bill.  What color hair does the sister have?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by SilverLining
 - March 28, 2015, 12:46:28 PM
Sounds like the pharmacists is covering his own @$$. 

Assume a calm mother comes in and asks for epi....sorry no, don't have a Rx, but someone's been in contact with satay.

(First...who the heck would say "someone" but even so.....imagine she did.)

Pharmacist says NO.  Would he not say.....did the person with allergy touch/eat it? Would he not ask....is the person having a reaction?

Half a brain and yes he would.

Posted by Macabre
 - March 28, 2015, 09:34:22 AM
I couldn't either--was seething. . I agree with Lakeswimmr.
Posted by GoingNuts
 - March 28, 2015, 07:56:04 AM
I couldn't even finish it.   :'(
Posted by PurpleCat
 - March 28, 2015, 07:05:49 AM
What a heartbreaking story.  And I am sure there is more to it.  This ending makes me very angry!

He returned a verdict of death by misadventure and recommended people with allergies be given "some sort of objective evidence" they can show to third parties in emergencies.


Save a child's life, ask questions later!  Fix the problem later!  Get your "evidence" later!
Posted by lakeswimr
 - March 27, 2015, 09:33:11 PM
This is a failure by the child's doctors.  Very tragic.   Preventable if parents are given information.