Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Three blonde, blue-eyed siblings are named Suzy, Jack and Bill.  What color hair does the sister have?:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by CMdeux
 - April 16, 2015, 03:06:32 PM
DD also skin tests negative to milk-- and she shouldn't.  Well, at least in the past.

She also skin tests negative for almond now, but I'm not sure that I'll believe that one without an IOFC, either.

The false negative rate (according to our own Dr. Awesome) is a bit under 5%-- that is, for those people who genuinely HAVE an IgE-mediated food allergy, as many as 5% of those people could skin test negative at any particular time, for reasons that aren't clear.

I'm not sure where his value comes from.  It's definitely that testing negative is WAY more meaningful than testing positive-- and that SPT which are negative are more meaningful by far than RAST which are-- but it's not foolproof.
Posted by GoingNuts
 - April 10, 2015, 07:19:00 AM
Younger DS had false negative to dairy when he was little, and the allergist was clear that the test results aren't 100%, which is why a clinical history is so important. 
Posted by joanna5
 - April 09, 2015, 04:03:01 PM
RAST came back- he has definitely not outgrown. 
Posted by joanna5
 - April 07, 2015, 01:58:36 PM
Thank you!  I really doubt he has outgrown it, but am anxiously awaiting the blood test to see where that stands. 
Posted by spacecanada
 - April 06, 2015, 05:14:17 PM
I have false negatives to all my allergens on the skin test, despite contact hive reactions outside of the allergist's office.  I had false positives on the same test.  My Mum has false negatives to two of her three food allergens too, thogh no contact reactions for her otherwise.  So it happens.  I think the statistic I last read was false negatives can happen in up to 10% of patients. That is pretty high when you think of it. I don't know if that rate is for people who repeatedly test false negative or if it includes those who tested positive one time and then no wheal another time.  Hopefully someone with more experience will chime in.

It will be interesting to see the new RAST scores to see if they reflect a lower number as well.  I hope you can get some answers from your allergist. 
Posted by joanna5
 - April 06, 2015, 11:04:39 AM
I know that skin tests tend to be prone to false positives, but anyone have experience with false negatives?

My ten year old is allergic to milk, egg, peanut, tree nut, and mustard.  At his skin test last week, we were shocked to see him test negative to peanuts. All of his other allergens were definite positives. Last year, his peanut skin test was 15/30- that's on the smaller side for him, but definitely not anything borderline.  His RAST for peanuts was 16.2.  We redid the RAST, obviously, and are betting on some bizarre fluke, but it's hard not to get excited about the possibility of maybe outgrowing something.

I'd appreciate any thoughts or experiences...