Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Spell the answer to 6 + 7 =:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by ninjaroll
 - April 23, 2015, 06:25:20 PM
Any chance for giving some context on linking an old(er) paper?  Is this new to you or the UK?  In USA it's relatively dated and in Asia it's not really part of the research landscape.  It's not news here, really.  At least not relatively unknown.  We're all kind of in a holding pattern on forthcoming pubs and data.
Posted by eragon
 - April 23, 2015, 12:32:00 PM
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4276304/
Posted by ninjaroll
 - April 22, 2015, 02:22:39 PM
QuoteI cannot stress strongly enough – these trials – no one has done them but us. We are pioneers.

I can vouch for that.  Even in the pan-Asian allergy congress no one, and I mean NO ONE, mentioned or referenced it all.  That works counter to replicability in different populations.  I can't quite put my finger on what or where this sort of took a different path than the sort of publications I was expecting.