This one has some different information.

http://www.webmd.com/diet/news/20120718/egg-therapy-may-help-allergic-kids

Oooooo... VERY interesting quote, this:

QuoteResearcher A. Wesley Burks, who chairs the Department of Pediatrics at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, tells WebMD that an important goal of future research is learning how to identify who will and will not outgrow food allergies early on and who will benefit from oral immunotherapy.

He adds that the fact that four of the children in the study had to drop out because of allergic reactions suggests that the therapy will not work for everyone.

"I think there is probably a small percentage of kids who will not tolerate a treatment like this, and we need to learn how to identify them early on," he says. "But for kids who do respond, this treatment can be life altering."

THIS is why our allergist has steadfastly maintained that immunotherapy is "highly experimental" at this point in time-- moreso for anyone that has had a severe reaction (like DD, who technically might have been excluded from the OIT trial reported in the study b/c of questions about past reactions involving BP changes).

We are hoping that DD is in this group that can derive some benefit, but the truth is that we don't really know.  She has not been seriously ill in the 20 months that we've been dosing with egg, and we're aware that any tweaks to the immune system (like illness) can cause unpredictable changes in reactivity in some people. 

Mostly, I want to emphasize how much this is still sooooooo not a weekend DIY project.     While what I'm doing may SEEM like it's a personal DIY project, this is being done with the full consultation of a VERY good food allergy specialist that has a direct number for some of these research gurus-- and uses it regularly.  I know that he's gotten advice re: our DD from Burks in the past-- and maybe even from Sampson. 

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-07/jhmi-cat071512.php

Quote
Children allergic to eggs can benefit from 'egg therapy'
Study shows oral immunotherapy can retrain the immune system


Giving children with egg allergies increasingly higher doses of the very food they are allergic to can eliminate or ease reactions in most of them, according to results from a federally funded study conducted at Johns Hopkins Children's Center and four other U.S. institutions.

The research findings, published July 19 in The New England Journal of Medicine, add to a growing body of evidence showing that feeding escalating doses of a food — an approach known as oral immunotherapy — can, over time, condition the immune system to tolerate the food with minimal or no reactions. Recent, smaller studies conducted at Johns Hopkins and elsewhere have shown the approach can also be useful in treating children allergic to milk and peanuts.

The researchers say the results are promising but caution that, at present, oral immunotherapy is still considered experimental and should not be used outside of a strictly controlled research protocol.

In the current study, conducted as part of the NIH-funded Consortium of Food Allergy Research, 35 of 40 children treated with egg immunotherapy experienced improvement. Five of the 40 patients dropped out of the study, four of them due to allergic reactions related to treatment. Eleven of the 35 patients experienced complete long-term elimination of egg-related allergic reactions, the most sought-after therapeutic outcome. The rest of the children were able to tolerate higher doses of egg with only mild or no symptoms, but lost some of their tolerance after discontinuing treatment. However, a higher threshold of tolerance, the researchers say, is an important therapeutic endpoint because it can protect against serious allergic reactions from accidental or incidental exposures and give patients and parents a peace of mind at restaurants, parties and other venues where food control is difficult or impossible.

"More than a quarter of the children in our study lost their egg allergies altogether, but we also saw dramatic improvements in those who didn't, which in and of itself is an important therapeutic achievement," says Robert Wood, M.D, director of allergy and immunology at Johns Hopkins Children's Center. "These children went from having serious allergic reactions after a single bite of an egg-containing cookie to consuming eggs with minimal or no symptoms."

In the study, 55 children, ages 5 through 18, received escalating doses of egg-white powder or a cornstarch placebo for 10 months. Thirteen of the 15 patients treated with placebo failed an oral food challenge, which requires a child to eat under medical observation 5 grams of egg protein, or the equivalent of half a large egg. Two placebo patients had dropped out before the challenge.

After the initial 10-month buildup, 22 of 35 children treated with egg whites were able to consume 5 grams of egg protein, 14 of them without symptoms. All 35 children continued to consume small doses of egg whites daily for 22 more months — the so-called maintenance phase, during which daily exposure to small doses of the allergen is believed to build tolerance. At the end of the 22-month maintenance phase, children underwent a food challenge with 10 grams of egg whites. Thirty out of the 35 children passed the 22-month food challenge. Those who passed the 10-gram food challenge then ceased all egg consumption for four to six weeks and underwent a final food challenge after the "abstinence" period. Eleven children were still able to tolerate 10 grams of egg protein — the equivalent of a large egg — without any symptoms and were considered completely cured of their allergy. Being able to consume eggs without a reaction after a period of abstinence is considered the true marker of sustained tolerance, the scientists say. During a phone follow-up one year later, all 11 reported eating eggs and egg-containing products without symptoms as frequently or as infrequently as they chose.

The fact that most children lost some of their tolerance after only a month of abstinence underscores the importance of daily exposure to an allergen to maintain tolerance, the researchers say.

An estimated 4 percent of U.S. children have food allergies and, by age 3, nearly 3 percent of children have evidence of egg allergies, the researchers say. Some children outgrow their food allergies, but for many they are life long and require complete avoidance to prevent serious or life-threatening reactions.


###

Other institutions participating in the study included Duke University, University of Arkansas, National Jewish Health, and Mt. Sinai School of Medicine in New York.

A. Wesley Burkes, M.D., of Duke University, and Stacie Jones, M.D., of the University of Arkansas, were lead authors on the NEJM report.

Emphasis mine.  This is very similar to the protocol that we have been following w/ our allergist's advice (though we are using carefully monitored doses of highly cooked whole egg).  Our allergist offered us the chance to try doing this with baked egg after discussing the protocol with the Duke team and trying it out on his own (egg-allergic) child. 

We are also nowhere near these amounts nor rate of increase-- DD is, after nearly 20 months of daily dosing, up to almost 330 mg of protein.  That's a long way from even 5 g (5 g = 5000 mg), but it seems to be "holding" the way that we are doing it-- that is, I deliberately took her off of that daily dose at the 300 mg mark for over four weeks and then reintroduced the same dose.  The first day, she experienced some diffuse symptoms that may or may not have been egg-dosing related.  It's certainly possible.  DD is not a good candidate for an out-grow given her age and history, so we have little to lose by trying this (as long as we're extremely conservative, which we have been).  I figured that 20 months in was about right in terms of seeing whether or not we're affecting real change that will 'stay' after we quit dosing.  If it doesn't stick, then we don't really have a good reason to take the dose higher, and it certainly increases risk to do that. 

Our intention is to make an accidental ingestion less likely to provoke life-threatening anaphylaxis, though-- not to force true tolerance.  We're given up on that particular item.  If her milk allergy is anything to judge by, she may never have full tolerance anyway.  But one less thing that can kill her would be good.   



I'm going to cross-post this down in the egg forum under my DD's challenge thread.