Implementation of Anaphylaxis Management Guidelines: A Register-Based Study

Started by SilverLining, February 14, 2013, 08:34:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

SilverLining

http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035778

Quote2114 severe anaphylaxis patients from 58 centres were included. 8% received adrenaline intravenously, 4% intramuscularly

8% received adrenaline intravenously?  Would that help at all?


ETA:  I think this article is about Germany, not US or Canada.
...taking the sign out of the window...

Macabre

Yeah, it looks like it was from Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

I was shocked at how low that was but remembered BeingHuman mentioning how much less it is recommended to use the Epi in the UK.
DS: 🥜, 🍤

SilverLining

but what shocked me is twice as many received it intravenously then those that received it intramuscularly.  even in hospital, isn't it given intramuscular for anaphylaxis.
...taking the sign out of the window...

Macabre

DS: 🥜, 🍤

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Three blonde, blue-eyed siblings are named Suzy, Jack and Bill.  What color hair does the sister have?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview